Without any knowledge of it, I joked in my status I posted in Facebook yesterday: "Kung hindi na ako makakapag-download ng Survivor episodes dahil sa SOPA (If I won't be able to download future Survivor episodes anymore because of SOPA)... NO TO SOPA! :)) Hoho!" I was quite on track.
Yesterday, the news about Wikipedia blackout spread in the social networks especially on Twitter. Everybody was tweeting about supporting Wikipedia blackout. I became curious as to the reason of this certain online "event". Then I found out, it was all about a proposed bill in the US that, if would be enacted to a law, would certainly affect netizens worldwide.
This house bill is the Stop Online Piracy Act (HR 3261 as introduced in the House) or popularly known as SOPA. It was quite funny when I first read that abbreviation, because in our language (Filipino), sopa would more likely be the colloquial term for sofa bed. Well, I was getting more and more curious about this SOPA. And when I looked for photos about it in Google, these came out:
The bill proposes to allow the US Department of Justice and the copyright holders to seek court orders against websites executing copyright infringement. (Wikipedia, 2012) That proposal is not new, for me personally, since I know there are certain videos in YouTube, for example, that had been closed for violating copyright rules; and even in Mediafire deleting certain audio files reported to be uploaded against intellectual property rules. But these actions are not quite enough for SOPA.

I watched a video in YouTube as to why and how dangerous SOPA would be. It said that once SOPA is enacted, the freedom of people online would be extremely surging down. Posting of personal videos with music under exclusive copyright (e.g. covers, bar dancing clips), publishing blogs with photos taken from somewhere else (scan my blog for proof), sending emails with copyrighted mp3s would be illegal actions, and anybody caught doing these stuff would be reprimanded. I do not know who would and how. Facebook, Twitter, among other social networks would be very much more different than we know them today. And, it would cost people their privacy, because everybody is being watched of possible violation of the law by veto power, such as private police. Not that it only threatens the freedom of people to express their feelings online, or share something online, but it also threatens personal and cyber security.
Everything has a consequence, even the advancement of the world in technology. Inventions are great, but consequences of it are felt in a long run. But the advancement of digital recording seems to come with a price - the freedom of the online world. It seems like, for SOPA and PIPA, online freedom and technology block economic growth and creativity. Is it really for the economy's growth, or one industry's interests too many? I don't get that. Because cutting and blocking off advertisement to sites known for their service in providing information to public, that is cutting and blocking economic growth, too.
If it ain't broke, don't dare fix it. In a video I just watched, it is said that internet works perfectly just fine and if that works for you that way, then there is no need to mess with it. It has been a very good medium for "free expression, economic innovation, and cultural communications". And alternating what the internet used to be would be a great chaos.
If it ain't broke, don't dare fix it. In a video I just watched, it is said that internet works perfectly just fine and if that works for you that way, then there is no need to mess with it. It has been a very good medium for "free expression, economic innovation, and cultural communications". And alternating what the internet used to be would be a great chaos.
If SOPA would be implemented, I'd ask my parents for cable TV with CBS on it, for real-time Survivor experience (and blogging). And, I will definitely spend huge amount of money to buy Survivor DVDs!!! Well, kidding aside, if it would be passed in the future, and I know it will be, I cannot do anything about it, really. If it would be passed, recording/copying/creating (torrents of) movies, series, and audio files is violating one's intellectual property rights; and downloading it would be illegal. If it would be enacted to law, posting your personal thoughts, videos, and photos would be extremely censored, so no one can get it from you. If it would be executed, online world won't be free at all. The cost of the online world being free is its freedom itself.
But what the hell, there will be another technological advancement in the future that will make sharing stuff online more possible, and more legal. Whether you are for it, or you're against it, one thing is for sure - the hope for more advancement is huge. Let us just hope that in these future advancements, being free does not come with a price.
Thomas More once said, "For if you suffer your people to be ill-educated, and their manners to be corrupted from their infancy, and then punish them for those crimes to which their first education disposed them, what else is to be concluded from this, but you first make thieves and then punish them." And from the context of today, people are not ill-educated but actually quite brilliantly educated - inventing digital technologies which are making our lives convenient. People made the digital technology possible by various research and development. The progress is so exponential, we really must keep up with it. But with how I see SOPA, it indirectly blames the increase in people's technical knowledge. It is like More's quote quite frankly. Punishing people for what they've progressed into? Let them invent it, then punish them for using it. Seriously though, right?
Images taken from Google --- This would be a SOPA violation, too. Hoho.